This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Proposed 2012 Charging scheme, Board comments
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposed 2012 Charging scheme, Board comments
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposed 2012 Charging scheme, Board comments
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Clement Cavadore
ccavadore at yacast.fr
Mon Oct 3 20:06:21 CEST 2011
Hi Nigel, On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 19:32 +0200, Nigel Titley wrote: > We are looking at increased costs largely because we expect the "run out > fairly" and IPv4 depletion measures to result in much more work for > registration services. In addition we are throwing more resources at > Ipv6 outreach. We've set a deficit budget to try and compensate and > reduce the fees to the members. Full budget (and charging scheme > details) will be available well in time for the AGM. What will happen to those resources when the available IPv4 resources will be definitely ran out ? Regards, -- Clément Cavadore
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposed 2012 Charging scheme, Board comments
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposed 2012 Charging scheme, Board comments
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]