This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Proposed 2012 Charging scheme, Board comments
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposed 2012 Charging scheme, Board comments
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposed 2012 Charging scheme, Board comments
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Mon Oct 3 19:32:31 CEST 2011
On 03/10/2011 13:44, SPEEDNIC S.R.L. - RIPE Handling wrote: > Dear Simon, > > Am 03.10.2011 05:40, schrieb Simon Lockhart: >> Has anyone from RIPE said that the budget is 12M? 15M? 18M? Is just just >> speculation on the part of one member? > thats not a speculation of my part. It is - as told - based on the > actual members and the matrix chart. You can calculate it by your own if > you want. > We are looking at increased costs largely because we expect the "run out fairly" and IPv4 depletion measures to result in much more work for registration services. In addition we are throwing more resources at Ipv6 outreach. We've set a deficit budget to try and compensate and reduce the fees to the members. Full budget (and charging scheme details) will be available well in time for the AGM. As has been mentioned, though, the budget and charging scheme are actually separate (although related) issues. Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposed 2012 Charging scheme, Board comments
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposed 2012 Charging scheme, Board comments
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]