This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] [Ticket#2011100301001283] Proposed 2012 Charging scheme, Board comments
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [Ticket#2011100301001283] Proposed 2012 Charging scheme, Board comments
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [Ticket#2011100301001283] Proposed 2012 Charging scheme, Board comments
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
LeaderTelecom Ltd.
info at leadertelecom.ru
Mon Oct 3 17:16:33 CEST 2011
> I agree that meeting can bring more value to their attendants than webinar. But in my opinion they can > be fully paid by their participants. Yes! In general I mean that meetings should be paid by people who will go to this meetings, but I believe that in this case cost per person of meeting will rapidly increase. And in this case we can use webinars. I often use webinars IBM, Symantec and etc and I think that it is very convenient. Most of questions we can solve faster using internet communications while meetings rarely performed. It is impossible to wait half year for meeting. -- Alexey S Ivanov General Director LeaderTelecom Ltd. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20111003/5b1f2b50/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [Ticket#2011100301001283] Proposed 2012 Charging scheme, Board comments
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [Ticket#2011100301001283] Proposed 2012 Charging scheme, Board comments
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]