This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] [Ticket#2011100301001283] Proposed 2012 Charging scheme, Board comments
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [Ticket#2011100301001283] Proposed 2012 Charging scheme, Board comments
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposed 2012 Charging scheme, Board comments
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Clement Cavadore
ccavadore at yacast.fr
Mon Oct 3 17:00:37 CEST 2011
Hi, On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 16:42 +0200, Erik Bais wrote: > The benefit of having the RIPE meetings in person is that people actually have a better interaction than with a webinar. > > > I think webinars are a great idea. It lets all the members go back and > > watch it as much as needed. Plus it would be great to have an expanded > > library of webinar training videos. > > It is the option of full-duplex communication (the discussion) that adds value where you won't have that with a webinar is my experience. > > Replacing the actual meeting itself 100% by a webinar is contra productive I think. Even if I have never attended a RIPE meeting (for various reasons), I completely agree with that. Meetings are, imho, mostly a social event. There would be less interest in simple webinars. Regards, -- Clément Cavadore Yacast Media
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [Ticket#2011100301001283] Proposed 2012 Charging scheme, Board comments
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposed 2012 Charging scheme, Board comments
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]