This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Surprise on renew fees
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Surprise on renew fees
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Surprise on renew fees
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alexander Zubkov
green at msu.ru
Wed Dec 14 06:49:46 CET 2011
On 12/13/2011 11:32 PM, Michał Margula wrote: > W dniu 13.12.2011 20:23, LIR pisze: >> I am new to RIPE and list, and I did not see any conversation of that kind. >> >> Anyway, I find this way of calculating is not fair at all, despite of used. >> >> This model does not compute real usage of resources, but penalizes new >> entries and gives resources for free to old members. >> >> Regards, >> >> Tonino >> > > I can't agree. W got our first resources about 5 years ago. First year > we were "EXTRA SMALL", and then every year we are categorized "SMALL", > altough we requested some more resources. > > And does 500 euro per year really makes any difference? Really?? Let's > count IPv4 - you got /21 which is 1024 addresess which makes 50 cents > (per year! about 4 cents a month!!) difference. > > And about fairness of that calculation - the later you get resources the > more are they valuable, and they really are! > This is absolutely correct in case of one-time payment. But membership fee is regular and you are right - resources are valuable. And this should be applied to all members, not to newcomers only.
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Surprise on renew fees
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Surprise on renew fees
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]