This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tonnerre Lombard
tonnerre.lombard at sygroup.ch
Fri Jun 19 17:25:55 CEST 2009
Salut, On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:03:08AM +0100, Martin List-Petersen wrote: > Tonnerre Lombard wrote: > > In that case it is difficult to change a policy which previously held > > unlimited validity. If there was however a clause defining that the > > policy may be superseeded at any time, then it can be debated that it was > > the responsibility of the sponsoring LIR to make corresponding contracts. > > Can you point out to me, where it said unlimited ? The answer lies in the lack of limitation. As far as I know, any type of agreement cannot be changed unilaterally unless that was clearly provided for. This has not been the case with old RIPE PI ressource agreements as far as I know. Kind regards, Tonnerre -- SyGroup GmbH Tonnerre Lombard Solutions Systematiques Tel:+41 61 333 80 33 Güterstrasse 86 Fax:+41 61 383 14 67 4053 Basel Web:www.sygroup.ch tonnerre.lombard at sygroup.ch -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20090619/4d0ee560/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]