[members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tonnerre Lombard
tonnerre.lombard at sygroup.ch
Fri Jun 19 17:25:55 CEST 2009
Salut, On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:03:08AM +0100, Martin List-Petersen wrote: > Tonnerre Lombard wrote: > > In that case it is difficult to change a policy which previously held > > unlimited validity. If there was however a clause defining that the > > policy may be superseeded at any time, then it can be debated that it was > > the responsibility of the sponsoring LIR to make corresponding contracts. > > Can you point out to me, where it said unlimited ? The answer lies in the lack of limitation. As far as I know, any type of agreement cannot be changed unilaterally unless that was clearly provided for. This has not been the case with old RIPE PI ressource agreements as far as I know. Kind regards, Tonnerre -- SyGroup GmbH Tonnerre Lombard Solutions Systematiques Tel:+41 61 333 80 33 Güterstrasse 86 Fax:+41 61 383 14 67 4053 Basel Web:www.sygroup.ch tonnerre.lombard at sygroup.ch -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20090619/4d0ee560/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]