This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Sun Jun 21 14:54:47 CEST 2009
On Sun, 21 Jun 2009, Martin List-Petersen wrote: > b) i'd like to be able to check myself, that the underlying voting > system actually does, what it says on the tin. > > c) maybe we don't want to give the NCC any chance (we know they don't do > it, but why tempt them), with tampering with the way the system counts > the votes. > > The external open source system, maybe even handled by an external > entity would cover all those 3 points. I don't attribute malice to NCC just incompentence in this realm. Therefore, I have no problem with them running the voting system. -Hank
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]