This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Martin List-Petersen
martin at airwire.ie
Sun Jun 21 14:04:01 CEST 2009
Hank Nussbacher wrote: > At 01:41 PM 19-06-09 +0100, Rob Evans wrote: >> Hi, >> >> > voting through the lir portal, great idea. >> > (first on the agenda, the correction of 2007-01).. >> >> Could you clarify what you want electronic voting for? >> >> The policy development process? Which doesn't have any voting at the >> moment, it is a consensus-based approach on open mailing lists -- please >> read the link that Andy Davidson sent around earlier for more >> information. >> >> Or the General Meeting where decisions are made relating to the RIPE >> NCC? (Voting on the RIPE NCC executive board, accepting the charging >> scheme and budget, etc.) > > Budgets, charging schemes, etc. If a vote is called for at an AGM and > 50 out of 5000 people vote, there should be the ability to submit ones > vote via the LIR Portal as well. It is called democracy. Well. It goes even further. At the AGM it was raised, if this should be done via a postal voting system, the LIRportal or an external open source system. And to be honest, the LIRportal is in control of the NCC. I made it very clear, that I'd prefer a) if we spend money/ressources on something to let anybody benefit from that, ergo send it towards and existing open source system, b) i'd like to be able to check myself, that the underlying voting system actually does, what it says on the tin. c) maybe we don't want to give the NCC any chance (we know they don't do it, but why tempt them), with tampering with the way the system counts the votes. The external open source system, maybe even handled by an external entity would cover all those 3 points. Now, the vote on that hasn't been done yet, but there was some clear opinions on where we go, because I didn't stand alone in the room with that opinion. As for budgets, charging schemes, etc., yes, that's up for vote/discussion at the AGM. Correct. Kind regards, Martin List-Petersen -- Airwire - Ag Nascadh Pobail an Iarthair http://www.airwire.ie Phone: 091-865 968
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]