[members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010

well fine, then start with the huge allocations that are PRE-RIR and no
longer in use but still registered to various multinationals...
if you are going to do a cleanup, do it properly :P

several /14s etc  there.. go ahead.



-- 

Sven Olaf Kamphuis
CB3ROB DataServices

Phone: +31/87-8747479
Skype: CB3ROB
MSN:   sven at cb3rob.net
C.V.:  http://www.linkedin.com/in/cb3rob

Confidential: Please be advised that the information contained in this
email message, including all attached documents or files, is privileged
and confidential and is intended only for the use of the individual or
individuals addressed. Any other use, dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.

On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Dariusz Margas wrote:

> On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Sven Olaf Kamphuis wrote:
>
> > point remains: there is -no- legal basis on which to bill existing PI
> > customers or on wich to force them to engage in a new contract, besides the already
> > fulfilled contract to "register ip space" for them, its quite close to
> > blackmail if the "threat" includes to remove their allocations if they
> > dont enter into a new recurring-payment contract (even if the lir would
> > pay for it and not charge the customer, the customer still has to enter
> > into a new contract, with which they potentially could have issues.
>
> Is there any law basis to say that such block has ben assigned forever?
>
> I don't see it that way. Law is being changed every day. Any law can be
> changed so why not allocation policy? Is it different then, say, acts
> governing banks? If you fulfill current requirements for anything ATM
> (say to be a bank) then you can do this thing (say you can be a bank).
> Next year you may need to fulfill different requirements to persist.
> That's it.
>
> Regards
> Dariusz Margas
>
> X-CONTACT-FILTER-MATCH: "ripe.net"
>