[members-discuss] Re: [ncc-announce] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2010
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Re: [ncc-announce] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2010
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Re: [ncc-announce] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2010
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bernard Dugas
bernard.dugas.2009 at is-production.com
Tue Aug 4 18:47:40 CEST 2009
Still working on this allocation summary file : >> ftp://ftp.ripe.net/pub/stats/ripencc/delegated-ripencc-latest >> This shows all the delegated resources from the RIPE NCC to its members. - I assume that for IP ranges, assigned means PI : is it right or wrong ? - Some IPV4 assigned range have an IP address number (column I) that is not a power of 2, as it should be (like 193.39.32.0 which is described with 8704 address, that should be either 8192 for /19 or 16384 for /20). Why ? If anybody has some answers... Thanks a lot, Best regards, Bernard Dugas Bernard Dugas wrote: > Dear Jochem, > > Jochem de Ruig wrote: > >>> Sorry, i may be unclear, i look for a table like this : >>> >>> Category ExtraSmall Small Medium Large eXtraLarge >>> N° of AS N° of >>> /19V4 N° of >>> /20V4 N° of >>> /21V4 N° of >>> /22V4 N° of >>> /30V6 N° of >>> /31V6 N° of >>> /32V6 N° of >>> /33V6 >> >> >> I do not have a table like this available. The Charging Scheme is an >> automated process and has as output mainly a score per registry. This >> will require quite some manual work from our side. When this is very >> relevant to discuss the Charging Scheme then this will be possible in >> due time. > > > I think this is very relevant to understand the current billing scheme > that is quite complicated from my beginner point of view : > > What i understand is that there is a RessourceScore and a TimedScore : > - RessourceScore is based on an arbitrary value corresponding to each > ressource allocated or assigned to a member ; > - TimedScore is a value computed from each RessourceScore by taking into > account the age of the ressource allocation or assignation. > > Then, there is another function that make a classification of the > members in 5 classes, that i imagine are carefully chosen by factors i > don't know currently. > > But i don't forget that the basic goal of RIPE is to manage some scarce > resources that are IP adresses and ASNumbers. > > So as i am told that this classification of members in 5 categories is > important, i would like to know how the ressources are used by these 5 > categories. > > I can also understand that categories are an artificial concept that is > not important at all, and that would be a good explanation why there is > currently no table showing use of ressources by categories. > > But then i would ask myself why using categories in billing scheme if > they are not useful anywhere else ? > >> May be you can find the answer to your question from the readily >> information at: >> ftp://ftp.ripe.net/pub/stats/ripencc/delegated-ripencc-latest >> This shows all the delegated resources from the RIPE NCC to its members. > > > Thanks a lot for this link. > > This is interesting but miss the relationship side from each ressource > to the category. > > Best regards, -- __Bernard DUGAS ______________________________________________________ | IS Production s.a. Innovative Solutions | | Technoparc Pays de Gex bernard.dugas.2009 at is-production.com | | 01633 ST GENIS POUILLY CEDEX - FRANCE - Mob.: +33 615 333 770 | | PLEASE NOTE NEW EMAIL ! ATTENTION NOUVEL EMAIL ! | |______________________________________________________________________|
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Re: [ncc-announce] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2010
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Re: [ncc-announce] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2010
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]