[lir-wg] ICANN Reform

--On 8. oktober 2002 12:07 -0700 David Kessens <david at IPRG.nokia.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 11:19:03AM +0200, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
>>
>> randy wrote:
>> >  o things such as golden v6 allocations for anything 'important'
>> >    were discussed in a wg, voted (with almost no representation by
>> >    folk who run routers, i.e. will pay the costs), and done with
>> >    long laundry lists of ideas for who might deserve golden
>> >    prefixes, and all were approved.  it was a childish land grab.
>>
>> Sorry I am not aware of the issue. What worries me is that I cannot
>> find a reference to what you talk about in the minutes of either
>> the IPv6 DB or this WG. This is bad. Can you point me there?
>
> Just for the record: no such things happened in the ipv6 wg at the
> last RIPE meeting. It's the lir wg who sets policy.

The action from the lir-wg on the NCC was:
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/archive/ripe-43/presentations/ripe43-plen
ary-lir/sld008.html

43.4 NCC Continue the process to move the 6bone under the framework of the 
RIRs

Maybe this was not clear enough but this is in my opinion (and this is 
perhaps a place were my opinion counts :-) NOT a policy decision , but an 
action on the NCC to continue the process already started.

I would expect a complete policy proposal to be presented to go to the 
final policy approval process once all concerns were settled.

I'll make a note of labeling policy decision different from work in 
progress actions in the future.

Regards,

Hans Petter Holen
lir-wg Chair