[lir-wg] ICANN Reform

On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 11:19:03AM +0200, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
> 
> randy wrote:
> >  o things such as golden v6 allocations for anything 'important'
> >    were discussed in a wg, voted (with almost no representation by
> >    folk who run routers, i.e. will pay the costs), and done with
> >    long laundry lists of ideas for who might deserve golden
> >    prefixes, and all were approved.  it was a childish land grab.
> 
> Sorry I am not aware of the issue. What worries me is that I cannot
> find a reference to what you talk about in the minutes of either
> the IPv6 DB or this WG. This is bad. Can you point me there?

Just for the record: no such things happened in the ipv6 wg at the
last RIPE meeting. It's the lir wg who sets policy.

David K.
---