more authority for mnt-lower in the allocation objects
Arnd Vehling av at nethead.de
Thu Mar 14 12:10:37 CET 2002
Hi, Tanja Heimes wrote: [..] > This is my opinion: > Yes, it makes sence that RIPE NCC is the maintainer of a LIRs > allocation. > But in my opinion it makes NO sence that Cable and Wireles (and all > other LIRs) as mnt-lower > do not have the authority to change their own administrative and > technical contacts in the allocation. IMO this is correct. The LIR should be able to modify this information without needing to write to hostmaster at ripe.net (which may take some time depending on how busy the hostmaster team is). admin-c, tech-c, mnt-lower and mnt-routes within an allocation should be changeable by the LIR itself. I know this is difficult to accomplish while "mnt-by:" points to an ripe-maintainer. But as far as i know RIPE has a second database where all allocations are stored for cross-checlking. Therefore we could take an approach where the allocation may only be created by RIPE but may be updated by the according LIR. This can simply be accomplished by removing the RIPE-Maintainer from the object after creation and change it to the according maintainer of the LIR. regards, Arnd Vehling -- NetHead Network Design and Security Arnd Vehling av at nethead.De Gummersbacherstr. 27 Phone: +49 221 8809210 50679 Cologne, Germany Fax : +49 221 8809212
[ lir-wg Archives ]