[lir-wg] Re: NCC#2002069654 HMQUESTION

> You could consider contacting the relevant contacts related to the objects
> in question.  They may have their own maintainer they want to place on the
> objects, in which case you could send an update with the new maintainer as
the
> mnt-by: attribute.

They do not respond. Let us assume that the actual contacts are either
'stupid' or 'hostile'. What then ?

Peter

> If need be the following URL provides information on the creation of a new
> maintainer:
>
> <Maintainer Creation Procedure>
>
http://www.ripe.net/ripencc/pub-services/db/Maintainer_Creation_Procedure.ht
ml
>
> Please contact me if you require further assistance.
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Winston Schenkers
> RIPE NCC
>
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 17:03:16 +0100, Knowtion Hostmaster Role Account
wrote:
> * > You are correct to say that you can not remove a maintainer from a
> * <aut-num>
> * > object without adding a new one.
> * >
> * > The attribute <mnt-by> in the <aut-num> object is mandatory, the AS
number
> * > AS9179 is part of the <as-block> from the RIPE NCC, and if correct the
> * > maintainer <AS9179-MNT> is being maintained by yourselves.
> *
> * How can I phrase this better ?
> *
> * AS9179-MNT (me / my company) is the current but out-of-date maintainer
on an
> * object. Without deleting the object (as it is not relly mine) how can I
> * cease being associated with it ?
> *
> * I (AS9179-MNT) no longer am the maintainer of various objects that
really
> * belong to the company X in the UK. My company has not been associated
with
> * them or provided services to them for sometime.
> *
> * Is it good and recommended practice therefore for me to just delete the
> * objects - this may affect someones service ?
> *
> * cc'ed to lir-wg in case anyone has a better idea...
> *
> * Petr
> *
>