[lir-wg] Re: NCC#2002069654 HMQUESTION
RIPE NCC ncc at ripe.net
Tue Jul 16 10:01:51 CEST 2002
Dear Peter, Thank you for your reply. In answer to your questions; * AS9179-MNT (me / my company) is the current but out-of-date maintainer on an * object. Without deleting the object (as it is not relly mine) how can I * cease being associated with it ? You could consider contacting the relevant contacts related to the objects in question. They may have their own maintainer they want to place on the objects, in which case you could send an update with the new maintainer as the mnt-by: attribute. If need be the following URL provides information on the creation of a new maintainer: <Maintainer Creation Procedure> http://www.ripe.net/ripencc/pub-services/db/Maintainer_Creation_Procedure.html Please contact me if you require further assistance. Kind regards, Winston Schenkers RIPE NCC On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 17:03:16 +0100, Knowtion Hostmaster Role Account wrote: * > You are correct to say that you can not remove a maintainer from a * <aut-num> * > object without adding a new one. * > * > The attribute <mnt-by> in the <aut-num> object is mandatory, the AS number * > AS9179 is part of the <as-block> from the RIPE NCC, and if correct the * > maintainer <AS9179-MNT> is being maintained by yourselves. * * How can I phrase this better ? * * AS9179-MNT (me / my company) is the current but out-of-date maintainer on an * object. Without deleting the object (as it is not relly mine) how can I * cease being associated with it ? * * I (AS9179-MNT) no longer am the maintainer of various objects that really * belong to the company X in the UK. My company has not been associated with * them or provided services to them for sometime. * * Is it good and recommended practice therefore for me to just delete the * objects - this may affect someones service ? * * cc'ed to lir-wg in case anyone has a better idea... * * Petr *
[ lir-wg Archives ]