[lir-wg] AS Number Policy

And when two organisations interconnect using a private peering ?

Filters are great, but similar foul ups can and will occur as with the use
of RFC1918 address space, as per my previous rant^We-mail.

Peter

----- Original Message -----
From: "Wolfgang Tremmel, WT5-RIPE" <wtremmel at vianetworks.com>
To: "Lu, Ping" <PLu at cw.net>; "'Matthew Robinson'" <matthew at crescent.org.uk>;
"Vladimir A. Jakovenko" <vovik at lucky.net>
Cc: "Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet" <woeber at cc.univie.ac.at>;
<lir-wg at ripe.net>
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 6:27 PM
Subject: RE: [lir-wg] AS Number Policy


> If it is nowhere advertised you could use a privat AS-number...
>
> Wolfgang
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-lir-wg at ripe.net [mailto:owner-lir-wg at ripe.net]On Behalf Of
> > Lu, Ping
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 6:55 PM
> > To: 'Matthew Robinson'; Vladimir A. Jakovenko
> > Cc: Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet; lir-wg at ripe.net
> > Subject: RE: [lir-wg] AS Number Policy
> >
> >
> > Definitely there is AS number being used within our backbone but not
> > advertised to public
> > network. So the AS number should be allowed to be registered but not
> > advertised the same way
> > as IP address is treated.
> >
> > Ping Lu
> > Cable & Wireless USA
> > Network Tools and Analysis Group
> > W: +1-703-292-2359
> > E: plu at cw.net
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Matthew Robinson [mailto:matthew at crescent.org.uk]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 9:57 AM
> > > To: Vladimir A. Jakovenko
> > > Cc: Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet; lir-wg at ripe.net
> > > Subject: Re: [lir-wg] AS Number Policy
> > >
> > >
> > > In the documentation for address space provision is made for
> > > assigning addresses to organisations that will NEVER be
> > > connected to the Internet but require uniqueness from private
> > > address space.
> > >
> > > Whilst I can't think of a specific example to apply to AS
> > > numbers, should this uniqueness be extended to AS numbers
> > > that do not show up in the routing table but are very much on-line?
> > >
> > > I also recon 3 months to get online although given the length
> > > of time it can take a big comapany to integrate a small one
> > > lets say 12 months for returning.
> > >
> > > Kind regards
> > >
> > > Matthew
> > >
>