[lir-wg] AS Number Policy
Wolfgang Tremmel, WT5-RIPE wtremmel at vianetworks.com
Tue Jul 9 19:27:29 CEST 2002
If it is nowhere advertised you could use a privat AS-number... Wolfgang > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-lir-wg at ripe.net [mailto:owner-lir-wg at ripe.net]On Behalf Of > Lu, Ping > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 6:55 PM > To: 'Matthew Robinson'; Vladimir A. Jakovenko > Cc: Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet; lir-wg at ripe.net > Subject: RE: [lir-wg] AS Number Policy > > > Definitely there is AS number being used within our backbone but not > advertised to public > network. So the AS number should be allowed to be registered but not > advertised the same way > as IP address is treated. > > Ping Lu > Cable & Wireless USA > Network Tools and Analysis Group > W: +1-703-292-2359 > E: plu at cw.net > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Matthew Robinson [mailto:matthew at crescent.org.uk] > > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 9:57 AM > > To: Vladimir A. Jakovenko > > Cc: Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet; lir-wg at ripe.net > > Subject: Re: [lir-wg] AS Number Policy > > > > > > In the documentation for address space provision is made for > > assigning addresses to organisations that will NEVER be > > connected to the Internet but require uniqueness from private > > address space. > > > > Whilst I can't think of a specific example to apply to AS > > numbers, should this uniqueness be extended to AS numbers > > that do not show up in the routing table but are very much on-line? > > > > I also recon 3 months to get online although given the length > > of time it can take a big comapany to integrate a small one > > lets say 12 months for returning. > > > > Kind regards > > > > Matthew > >
[ lir-wg Archives ]