[lir-wg] RIPE NCC AGMs (was: the 50% increase discussion)

Hi Kurt,

There was an "If the" in front of this. Unfortunate line break in the
way the mail got cut.

So it reads:

If the
>> RIPE NCC was consistently doing things the members do not want,
>> participation would be higher and this would be corrected.


KEL> I am sorry? Are you arguing that the NCC should not do what the members 
KEL> want?

I think we both know that this is not something DFK would ever say.

I'm not a member of the NCC so I'll just follow the conversation with
a private interest. Having been involved as an NCC staff member in the
past it's always interesting to follow the discussions.

All these meetings and still people revert to the bar for discussions:)

JC