[lir-wg] AS Number Policy - continued

  Not really important, but just to avoid being counted as agreeing :-)

>Anyway, I think that everyone have suggested to do both with a OR in 
>between.

  ...no objection against the OR, but the result of the OR should not be
  the _only_ input to a decision process. It would be an efficient
  mechanism to be used _in support_ of continued AS# holdership, though.

>Basically just claiming that "yes I do peer at backwater-IX with 
>Farm-IP and Countryside Networks and I don't get transit from anywhere" 
>should not be enouhg.

  I disagree.

>RIPE should be able to verify that this is true.

  Some nit-picking...

  RIPE (the community): I don't think so - other than having access to
  some publicly accessible documentation, e.g. in the Routing Registry.
  
  The NCC: maybe, if and when we can agree on the criteria,
  and the cost for verification vs. the result.

>- kurtis -

  Wilfried.