[lir-wg] AS Number Policy - continued

peering seperate from transit??

and a AS used for peering, may not be viewable at a looking glass

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-lir-wg at ripe.net [mailto:owner-lir-wg at ripe.net] On 
> Behalf Of Arnd Vehling
> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 6:38 AM
> To: s.willing at mops.net
> Cc: lir-wg at ripe.net
> Subject: Re: [lir-wg] AS Number Policy - continued
> 
> 
> 
> Sebastian Willing wrote:
> > 
> > I'ld suggest to first use all AS-# allocated to RIPE. Then 
> re-use the 
> > AS-# which has the oldest revoke-date (but only if this 
> date is older 
> > than one year or so).
> 
> Thats an good suggestion too. 
> 
> I dont know if this is out-of-scope of this discussion, but i 
> would suggest that a LIR, which applies for an AS-Num, should 
> be required to fax a written peering agreement signed by at 
> least 2 upstream-providers. 
> 
> This should reduce the the number of initialy unused as-nos somewhat.
> 
> best regards,
> 
>   Arnd
> -- 
> NetHead                                 Network Design and Security
> Arnd Vehling                            av at nethead.De
> Gummersbacherstr. 27                    Phone: +49 221 8809210
> 50679 Köln                              Fax  : +49 221 8809212
>