[lir-wg] AS Number Policy - continued

Peter Galbavy wrote:
> 
> > In addition, there are certain peers who do not require any contract
> > or signed document.
> 
> Like me, for example.

As i said: I dont want anybody to send in _contracts_. I just thought it would
be
a good idea to require a _simple_form_ with signatures of at least 2 upstreams
because
this will cut down the number of unused AS-Nums before they are delegated.
Therefore
cutting down RIPEs work recollecting them.

But i see that most of you are not very fond of this idea :)

regards,

  Arnd
-- 
NetHead                                 Network Design and Security
Arnd Vehling                            av at nethead.De
Gummersbacherstr. 27                    Phone: +49 221 8809210
50679 Köln                              Fax  : +49 221 8809212