90 IPv6 sub-TLA allocations made

Sabrina,

It would be nice if the new draft could be mailed to the relevant lists
before the RIPE 40 meeting so people can have a meaningful discussion.
Please can you indicate if/when a new version of the policy document will be
published?

Thanks,
Stuart

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sabrina Waschke [mailto:sabrina at ripe.net]
> Sent: 09 August 2001 17:16
> To: James Aldridge
> Cc: lir-wg at ripe.net; ipv6-wg at ripe.net
> Subject: Re: 90 IPv6 sub-TLA allocations made
> 
> 
> 
> James,
> 
> Your request for a subsequent sub-TLA allocation was evaluated 
> according to the Provisional IPv6 Assignment and Allocation 
> Policy (4.2.5. Criteria for Subsequent Sub-TLA Allocations).
> Please see: 
> 
> http://www.ripe.net/ipv6 
> 
> As you know this policy is under revision and the current
> discussions on these two mailing lists are encouraged.
> 
> All three Regional Internet Registries receive input from their
> communities and based on this a new draft of the policy document 
> will be presented at the upcoming RIPE 40 meeting in Prague.
> 
> The presentation "IPv6 Bootstrap Phase" given at the last RIPE 
> meeting in Bologna can be found at:
> 
> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/archive/ripe-39/presentation
s/ipv6develop/

A Supernational Registry is a special case. You may want to use 
this presentation as a starting point to discuss the minimum 
allocation size.


Kind regards,

Sabrina Waschke
 
-- 

o------------------------------------------o
| Sabrina Waschke         sabrina at ripe.net |
| Registration Services Operations Manager |
|                                          |
| RIPE NCC             tel +31 20 535 4444 |
| www.ripe.net         fax +31 20 535 4445 |
o------------------------------------------o