90 IPv6 sub-TLA allocations made
James Aldridge jhma at KPNQwest.net
Wed Aug 8 17:21:00 CEST 2001
David R Huberman wrote: > > > The last reply from the RIPE NCC hostmasters said, "Because Supernational > > Registries may not receive multiple IPv6 allocations you would need to have > > allocated 80% of the networks in your current sTLA before we could issue mo re > > address space." > > Please forgive my ignorance and allow me to ask, "where is it written that > Supernational Registries may not receive multiple sub-TLAs?" > > Is this a RIPE NCC interpretation of the bootstrap criteria or is it > actually written down somewhere? As far as I can see from a quick scan of rfc2928, it refers to "registries" only in terms of the RIRs and not as local IRs or other customers of the RIRs. Thus, I can only assume that restriction is the RIPE NCCs interpretation of the criteria. I intend to raise this issue at the LIR WG (which I co-chair) at RIPE40 in Prague in October. Any clarification from RIPE NCC staff prior to RIPE40 would be appreciated. James
[ lir-wg Archives ]