90 IPv6 sub-TLA allocations made

To: lists-lir-wg-out at lists.ripe.net
To: postmaster1 at wplus.net



To: lists-lir-wg-out at lists.ripe.net
To: postmaster1 at wplus.net



To: lists-lir-wg-out at lists.ripe.net
To: postmaster1 at wplus.net



To: lists-lir-wg-out at lists.ripe.net
To: postmaster1 at wplus.net



To: lists-lir-wg-out at lists.ripe.net
To: postmaster1 at wplus.net



To: lists-lir-wg-out at lists.ripe.net
To: postmaster1 at wplus.net



To: lists-lir-wg-out at lists.ripe.net
To: postmaster1 at wplus.net



To: lists-lir-wg-out at lists.ripe.net
To: James Aldridge <jhma at KPNQwest.net>


Reply-To: <E15UUhh-0001m9-00 at aegir.EU.net>

 
> The last reply from the RIPE NCC hostmasters said, "Because Supernational
> Registries may not receive multiple IPv6 allocations you would need to have
> allocated 80% of the networks in your current sTLA before we could issue more
> address space."

Please forgive my ignorance and allow me to ask, "where is it written that
Supernational Registries may not receive multiple sub-TLAs?"

Is this a RIPE NCC interpretation of the bootstrap criteria or is it
actually written down somewhere?

/david