[gigabell-technik] Re: RIPE Hostmasters visiting LIRs
Jan Ahrent Czmok j.czmok at gigabell.net
Thu Sep 16 18:10:43 CEST 1999
* Amar (amar at telia.net) [990916 17:58]: > > > Jan Ahrent Czmok wrote: > > > what should be covered are the costs ? 50 / 50 for lir / ripe or > > what else. > > You bring up an issue that we have to solve. And that is the > finance of this. I think that most of the interested bigger > LIR:s would be able to finance this on a, let's say, 50/50 basis. I agree completely. > (One thing. This should not be a way for an big ISP to get > a chance to do "lobbying" on his own turf. I am not afraid > of this. But i would only like to state my opinion of this.) > I think the hostmasters from ripe are very -straight- and i never see any lobbying.. > But those LIR:s that feel that they can not affford this is > the main factor. I do not know how hard it should strain RIPE:s > budget if we should do this: > > Eg: > > Size LIR/RIPE > --------------------------------------------------- > Large : 50/50 % > Medium : 35/65 % > Small : 20/80 % > I also have this idea in mind, but on the large and super national i would say 80/20 and medium 50/50 might be a better idea, as the most are in medium range and the bigger ones (such as we) shall support also the smaller ones. > ( These numbers i just a suggestion ) My numbers also.. > > The big LIR:s would "support" the smaller ones. But i am > willing to do this as long that i can see that this will > benefit the community as a whole. > Right. I think it could help the community as a whole and to fasten up many problems currently arising (e.g. long waiting queues) > How much expences would RIPE:s finances be able to take > without rising the memberfee for the LIR:s? > > If this would be a result of this, then i am sorry to > say, would not get a consensus on a meeting. > > Regards > > /Amar > > Telia Net > Jan
[ lir-wg Archives ]