Resent: Allocating a LIR an IP block per use
Yuval Shchory syuval at netvision.net.il
Sun Dec 5 13:49:58 CET 1999
Yes. That is exactly what I would like to do, but the problem is that I can't receive new allocation from RIPE unless my current is used to its half. What I would like to do is receive a new, large PI for BGP use, so it won't be mixed with my aggregateable /16s. I will be more than happy to hear from RIPE how this can be done. It might be that all I have to do is send a 141 with a remark - FOR BGP CUSTS and that would be it, but I'm not really sure. Regards, --- Yuval Shchory Projects Manager NetVision's Corporate Technical Support Department eMail: syuval at netvision.net.il interFAX: 03-5480255 --- > -----Original Message----- > From: Jules D Salter [mailto:jules at vas-net.net] > Sent: Sunday, December 05, 1999 2:46 PM > To: Yuval Shchory; lir-wg at ripe.net > Subject: Re: Resent: Allocating a LIR an IP block per use > > > Yuval, > > You could apply for PI (Provider Independant) address space. > But you would still need to fill out a RIPE-141 outlining how > you intend to use the address space. The other problem with PI > space, is that a lot of the backbones don't like routing it unless > you have a fairly large aggregate. > > The issues are raised in http://www.ripe.net/docs/ripe-127.html > > Joolsie > > Yuval Shchory wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > We would like to request another IP block from RIPE, > regardless of our > > current allocation (which we use for our day-to-day assignments to > > customers), in order to assign from this block only to > customers using BGP. > > I would not want to assign BGP customers from our regular > blocks, as it > > would create a need to subnet the BGP advertisements on > these blocks. We > > would like to have a block pre-intended for such fragmentation. > > > > However, as far as I recall RIPE's procedure, one can > request another IP > > allocation only after a certain percentage (50% AFAIR) of > his allocation has > > been assigned. > > > > So - am I the only person thinking this is the correct way > to do that? Is it > > possible to request a block for such usage, regardless of > the current > > allocation's usage? > > > > Regards, > > > > --- > > Yuval Shchory > > Projects Manager > > NetVision's Corporate Technical Support Department > > eMail: syuval at netvision.net.il > > interFAX: 03-5480255 > > --- >
[ lir-wg Archives ]