[ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?

Hi,

Fine, i get it: It's not only Microsoft and Cisco.

But this WG goes way beyond Eric and Veronika... so we might have someone 
who can actually help already in the WG, or we (collectively) need to find 
those who can make a difference.

But, imho, such list of 'gaps' is very, very useful!

Cheers,
Carlos


On Sun, 6 Oct 2019, Jens Link wrote:

> Carlos Friaças via ipv6-wg <ipv6-wg at ripe.net> writes:
>
>> Hi Alexander, All,
>>
>> Github is now owned by Microsoft.
>> Someone from Microsoft reading this? Maybe Veronika from Microsoft and
>> the UK IPv6 Council?
>>
>> Cisco: just saw a post from Eric Vyncke. :-))
>
> twitter, slack, amazon, stackexchange, redhat (registration does not
> work on v6 only), ....
>
> And from my Linux from Scratch experiment, see my presentation at
> RIPE76[1], all or at least some hosts from these domains dont support
> v6;
>
> astron.com
> github.com
> greenwoodsoftware.com
> infodrom.org
> linuxfromscratch.org
> mpfr.org
> sourceforge.net
> sourceware.org
> tukaani.org
> zlib.net
>
> Jens
> [1] https://ripe76.ripe.net/wp-content/uploads/presentations/146-we_dont_need_ipv6.pdf
> -- 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> | Delbrueckstr. 41    | 12051 Berlin, Germany           | +49-151-18721264 |
> | http://blog.quux.de | jabber: jenslink at quux.de        | ---------------  |
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>