This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jens Link
lists at quux.de
Sun Oct 6 11:39:14 CEST 2019
Carlos Friaças via ipv6-wg <ipv6-wg at ripe.net> writes: > Hi Alexander, All, > > Github is now owned by Microsoft. > Someone from Microsoft reading this? Maybe Veronika from Microsoft and > the UK IPv6 Council? > > Cisco: just saw a post from Eric Vyncke. :-)) twitter, slack, amazon, stackexchange, redhat (registration does not work on v6 only), .... And from my Linux from Scratch experiment, see my presentation at RIPE76[1], all or at least some hosts from these domains dont support v6; astron.com github.com greenwoodsoftware.com infodrom.org linuxfromscratch.org mpfr.org sourceforge.net sourceware.org tukaani.org zlib.net Jens [1] https://ripe76.ripe.net/wp-content/uploads/presentations/146-we_dont_need_ipv6.pdf -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Delbrueckstr. 41 | 12051 Berlin, Germany | +49-151-18721264 | | http://blog.quux.de | jabber: jenslink at quux.de | --------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]