[ipv6-wg] Have we failed as IPv6 Working Group?

> Carlos Friaças wrote :
> Admitting that "zealotism" is not a got thing might be a good 1st step.

I did not create the IPv4 zealots, I joined their ranks by economic necessity.
I do not like it, but I need the IPv4 ecosystem for 20 more years and I am not going to let the IPv6 zealots destroy my business.


>> 3 months ago, I turned DECNET off on my network. It was actually not even an IT/network decision; customer
>> decided they were done with a  product, and we de-commissioned the tools with DECNET. Business decision.
>> We run OS/2 Warp, MS-DOS, Windows 95, HPUX, Solaris, Windows 2000, and I probably forget some.

> So, hardly any IPv6 there :-)

100% IPv4 :-)

> If a new project pops up that will need 10x the public address space you have... good luck.

I already have several times more public space than I need. And, $20/IP is nothing in the cost of a new project.

Michel.