This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carlos Friaças
cfriacas at fccn.pt
Sat Oct 5 22:49:30 CEST 2019
On Sat, 5 Oct 2019, Jen Linkova wrote: > On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 4:04 AM Enno Rey <erey at ernw.de> wrote: >> I support the proposal. >> Once a protocol has reached mainstream deployment (as IPv6 has) a dedicated WG might no longer be needed. I mean, there's no IPv4 WG either, right? > > Actually it's exactly what I said after I became a co-chair. Our > ultimate goal should be to get rid of this group. Let' get IPv6 > deployed and go home. Or to the new adventure. As you've said, we do > not have IPv4 WG. > Unfortunately we are not there yet. Hi, "We" as in "everyone" -- 110% agree. And i must add: there is still a longgggg road ahead. Should the WG try to define new goals, or work more around some measurements in order to support goal evaluation...? Carlos > -- > SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry >
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]