This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jen Linkova
furry13 at gmail.com
Sat Oct 5 04:11:48 CEST 2019
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 4:04 AM Enno Rey <erey at ernw.de> wrote: > I support the proposal. > Once a protocol has reached mainstream deployment (as IPv6 has) a dedicated WG might no longer be needed. I mean, there's no IPv4 WG either, right? Actually it's exactly what I said after I became a co-chair. Our ultimate goal should be to get rid of this group. Let' get IPv6 deployed and go home. Or to the new adventure. As you've said, we do not have IPv4 WG. Unfortunately we are not there yet. -- SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Disband IPv6 WG
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]