This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/

[ipv6-wg] Fwd: [Bp_ixps] IXPs & IPv6

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Fwd: [Bp_ixps] IXPs & IPv6
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Fwd: [Bp_ixps] IXPs & IPv6

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Michael Oghia mike.oghia at gmail.com
Thu Oct 20 17:33:38 CEST 2016

Yes! Sorry about that Nick. Rob already clarified.

-Michael

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> wrote:

> Michael Oghia wrote:
> > Thanks Nick. Sad to hear, but hopefully we can change that.
>
> you're misunderstanding completely!  It means that ipv6 is considered to
> be of the same importance as ipv4 in the ixp world from the point of
> view of passing production traffic over the ixp fabric.  As far as the
> IXP world is concerned, this is an excellent situation to be in.
>
> Nick
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20161020/18e663c0/attachment.html>

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Fwd: [Bp_ixps] IXPs & IPv6
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Fwd: [Bp_ixps] IXPs & IPv6

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]