This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/

[ipv6-wg] Fwd: [Bp_ixps] IXPs & IPv6

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Fwd: [Bp_ixps] IXPs & IPv6
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Fwd: [Bp_ixps] IXPs & IPv6

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Nick Hilliard nick at foobar.org
Thu Oct 20 17:28:48 CEST 2016

Michael Oghia wrote:
> Thanks Nick. Sad to hear, but hopefully we can change that.

you're misunderstanding completely!  It means that ipv6 is considered to
be of the same importance as ipv4 in the ixp world from the point of
view of passing production traffic over the ixp fabric.  As far as the
IXP world is concerned, this is an excellent situation to be in.

Nick

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Fwd: [Bp_ixps] IXPs & IPv6
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Fwd: [Bp_ixps] IXPs & IPv6

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]