This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg] IPv6 martian filter-set
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 martian filter-set
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 martian filter-set
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Job Snijders
job at instituut.net
Thu Jul 9 13:38:03 CEST 2015
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 02:23:15PM +0300, Yannis Nikolopoulos wrote: > I'm not sure if people are using the fltr-martian-v6 filter set > maintained by Job Snijders: > > filter-set: fltr-martian-v6 > descr: Current IPv6 martians > mp-filter: { > 0000::/8^+, # loopback, unspecified, v4-mapped > 0200::/7^+, # Reserved by IETF [RFC4048] > 2001::/32^-, # Teredo prefix [RFC4380] > 2001:db8::/32^+, # NON-ROUTABLE range to be used for > documentation purpose [RFC3849] > 2002::/16^-, # 6to4 prefix [RFC3068] > 3ffe::/16^+, # used for the 6bone but was returned > [RFC5156] > 5f00::/8^+, # used for the 6bone but was returned > [RFC5156] > fc00::/7^+, # Unique Local Unicast [RFC4193] > fe80::/10^+, # Link Local Unicast [RFC4291] > fec0::/10^+, # Reserved by IETF [RFC3879] > ff00::/8^+ # Multicast [RFC4291] > } > > I'm trying to figure out why prefixes like 0200::/7 or 0400::/6 are not > included in this list 0200::/7 was already there. > Any ideas? The answer is simple: Vurt:~ job$ whois fltr-martian-v6 | grep manual remarks: this object is manually maintained I've just updated it, manually :-) Kind regards, Job
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 martian filter-set
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 martian filter-set
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]