This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg] IPv6 martian filter-set
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE71 IPv6 WG: call for presentations
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 martian filter-set
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Yannis Nikolopoulos
dez at otenet.gr
Thu Jul 9 13:23:15 CEST 2015
Hello, I'm not sure if people are using the fltr-martian-v6 filter set maintained by Job Snijders: filter-set: fltr-martian-v6 descr: Current IPv6 martians mp-filter: { 0000::/8^+, # loopback, unspecified, v4-mapped 0200::/7^+, # Reserved by IETF [RFC4048] 2001::/32^-, # Teredo prefix [RFC4380] 2001:db8::/32^+, # NON-ROUTABLE range to be used for documentation purpose [RFC3849] 2002::/16^-, # 6to4 prefix [RFC3068] 3ffe::/16^+, # used for the 6bone but was returned [RFC5156] 5f00::/8^+, # used for the 6bone but was returned [RFC5156] fc00::/7^+, # Unique Local Unicast [RFC4193] fe80::/10^+, # Link Local Unicast [RFC4291] fec0::/10^+, # Reserved by IETF [RFC3879] ff00::/8^+ # Multicast [RFC4291] } I'm trying to figure out why prefixes like 0200::/7 or 0400::/6 are not included in this list Any ideas? cheers, Yannis
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE71 IPv6 WG: call for presentations
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 martian filter-set
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]