This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/

[ipv6-wg] IPv6 martian filter-set

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE71 IPv6 WG: call for presentations
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 martian filter-set

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Yannis Nikolopoulos dez at otenet.gr
Thu Jul 9 13:23:15 CEST 2015

Hello,

I'm not sure if people are using the fltr-martian-v6 filter set 
maintained by Job Snijders:

filter-set:     fltr-martian-v6
descr:          Current IPv6 martians
mp-filter:      {
                 0000::/8^+,      # loopback, unspecified, v4-mapped
                 0200::/7^+,      # Reserved by IETF [RFC4048]
                 2001::/32^-,     # Teredo prefix [RFC4380]
                 2001:db8::/32^+, # NON-ROUTABLE range to be used for 
documentation purpose [RFC3849]
                 2002::/16^-,     # 6to4 prefix [RFC3068]
                 3ffe::/16^+,     # used for the 6bone but was returned 
[RFC5156]
                 5f00::/8^+,      # used for the 6bone but was returned 
[RFC5156]
                 fc00::/7^+,      # Unique Local Unicast [RFC4193]
                 fe80::/10^+,     # Link Local Unicast [RFC4291]
                 fec0::/10^+,     # Reserved by IETF [RFC3879]
                 ff00::/8^+       # Multicast [RFC4291]
                 }

I'm trying to figure out why prefixes like 0200::/7 or 0400::/6 are not 
included in this list

Any ideas?

cheers,
Yannis

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] RIPE71 IPv6 WG: call for presentations
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] IPv6 martian filter-set

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]