[ipv6-wg] Follow up on RIPE67 IPv6 Only experiment

On Jan 9, 2014, at 12:18 PM, Dan Luedtke <maildanrl at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Benedikt Stockebrand
> <bs at stepladder-it.com> wrote:
>> If I may offer one more suggestion, what about a "real" IPv6-only
>> network without 464XLAT or anything, preferably as yet another SSID?  I
> NAT64/DNS64 works fine (until someone decides to validate DNS records)

NAT64 works with host DNSSEC validation, provided that DNSSEC-validating host also does its own DNS64 function.  The interaction of NAT64 with host DNSSEC validation is described in RFC6147.

-d


> 
>> This *will* break things, but that way we can see *what* breaks, so we
>> can figure out what things need to be fixed.
>> From my experience with NAT64 you only break protocols that are
> already fundamentally broken :)
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Dan
> 
> -- 
> Dan Luedtke
> http://www.danrl.de
>