This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/

[ipv6-wg] Follow up on RIPE67 IPv6 Only experiment

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] [training] RIPE NCC Webinars - new dates
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Follow up on RIPE67 IPv6 Only experiment

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Dan Luedtke maildanrl at gmail.com
Thu Jan 9 21:18:54 CET 2014

Hi all,

On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Benedikt Stockebrand
<bs at stepladder-it.com> wrote:
> If I may offer one more suggestion, what about a "real" IPv6-only
> network without 464XLAT or anything, preferably as yet another SSID?  I
NAT64/DNS64 works fine (until someone decides to validate DNS records)

> This *will* break things, but that way we can see *what* breaks, so we
> can figure out what things need to be fixed.
>From my experience with NAT64 you only break protocols that are
already fundamentally broken :)


Best regards,

Dan

-- 
Dan Luedtke
http://www.danrl.de

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] [training] RIPE NCC Webinars - new dates
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Follow up on RIPE67 IPv6 Only experiment

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]