This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] Request to verify ipv6 addressing scheme in my diagram
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Request to verify ipv6 addressing scheme in my diagram
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Call for Papers: RIPE 67
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Maninder Singh
maninder.tiet at gmail.com
Wed Jun 12 21:54:34 CEST 2013
Hi Marco, I have assumed that a fixed /48 prefix is provided by the ISP to the organization. It is 2001:0A5D:4B1A::/48 Then, the network IDs (fourth field in address) are decided by the organization themselves and 2001:0A5D:4B1A:A120::/64 is the one that connects to Internet i.e. to ISP's edge router. Internally in organization, since NAT is not being used in IPv6, all of the routers will have public IPs. So, I have tried to change fourth field of the addresses and assigned to each interface of internal devices. Had it been IPv4, I would have used just one public address and all the internal interfaces would have private addresses. However, not having NAT is confusing me. Probably that's why I am not understanding what is meant by aggregating the IPv6 addresses at buildings. I am studying the IPv6-for-LIRs-Training-Course/IPv6_addr_plan4.pdf for more understanding. But can you please correct my understanding with an example? Thanks Maninder Singh P.S. - Is this just an email based forum or do we have web based forum where all responses can be seen? I have received just two responses. Seems like I have missed many. Can you please send a link where can I actively participate in this forum? On 6/7/13, MarcoH <marcoh at marcoh.net> wrote: > On Jun 7, 2013, at 11:02 AM, Alex Saroyan wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm not sure if this list is the right place but I can make at least >> several suggestions. > > Of course this is the right place > > You don't really say how big of an assignment you get, if it is a full /48 I > would leave some more gaps to deal with future growth. And as the previous > speaker suggested, think a bit about your aggregation strategy a bit. There > are two ways of looking at it: > > - Take a service oriented approach > - Follow the structure of the network and aggregated for instance on > buildings > > There are also various documents online that can help you with this, one was > written by Surfnet, the Dutch NREN, and is available at > https://www.ripe.net/lir-services/training/material/IPv6-for-LIRs-Training-Course/IPv6_addr_plan4.pdf > > And I'm sure there are people on this list who can help you, so hopefully > there will be more responses. > > Cheers, > > Marco > (co-chair of this group) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: exp_network.bmp Type: image/bmp Size: 2743254 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20130612/845a3e40/attachment.bmp>
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Request to verify ipv6 addressing scheme in my diagram
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Call for Papers: RIPE 67
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]