This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] Request to verify ipv6 addressing scheme in my diagram
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Request to verify ipv6 addressing scheme in my diagram
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Request to verify ipv6 addressing scheme in my diagram
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
MarcoH
marcoh at marcoh.net
Fri Jun 7 14:31:56 CEST 2013
On Jun 7, 2013, at 11:02 AM, Alex Saroyan wrote: > Hi, > > I'm not sure if this list is the right place but I can make at least several suggestions. Of course this is the right place You don't really say how big of an assignment you get, if it is a full /48 I would leave some more gaps to deal with future growth. And as the previous speaker suggested, think a bit about your aggregation strategy a bit. There are two ways of looking at it: - Take a service oriented approach - Follow the structure of the network and aggregated for instance on buildings There are also various documents online that can help you with this, one was written by Surfnet, the Dutch NREN, and is available at https://www.ripe.net/lir-services/training/material/IPv6-for-LIRs-Training-Course/IPv6_addr_plan4.pdf And I'm sure there are people on this list who can help you, so hopefully there will be more responses. Cheers, Marco (co-chair of this group)
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Request to verify ipv6 addressing scheme in my diagram
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Request to verify ipv6 addressing scheme in my diagram
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]