[ipv6-wg] IPv6 on P2P links

On 05/26/2011 10:07 AM, Jasper Jans wrote:
> Can anyone give me some real world experience with IPv6 numbering on P2P links in their network?
> 
> I've seen the recommendations swing from '/64' to '/127 if your equipment can handle it' and even
> to 'do not assign anything at all just use link-local' and access your devices over the loopback
> which your IGP will distribute.
> 
> The last option seems interesting to me from a IP assignment point of few. It safes me having
> to allocate a block for this part of the infrastructure. I'm just wondering if in the long run
> it will not make life harder.
> 
> Jasper
> 
> 
> Op dit e-mailbericht is een disclaimer van toepassing, welke te vinden is op http://www.espritxb.nl/disclaimer
> 
> 
> 


Our ISP is trying to stick with /64 P2P address space. But I've also
seen by one of our upstream providers, that they use /112. I don't want
to mention them, because their service sucks and the P2P global IPs
cannot be pinged, while LL addresses work


Us