This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/

[ipv6-wg] next version of RIPE-501, v.2

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] next version of RIPE-501, v.2
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] next version of RIPE-501, v.2

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jan Zorz @ go6.si jan at go6.si
Mon Jul 25 01:30:38 CEST 2011

On 7/25/11 1:21 AM, Sander Steffann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>> I would put this in 'mandatory':
>>>
>>> - If the IS-IS routing protocol is requested the equipment MUST
>>> support "M-ISIS: Multi-Topology (MT) Routing in Intermediate
>>> System to Intermediate Systems (IS-ISs)" [RFC 5120]
>>
>> ok, I see you already updated the draft on Gdocs.
>
> I didn't put this change in yet though :)

ah, ok, my mistake. Done, changed.

>
>> One question, should we use "MUST" with capital letters or we use
>> normal "must" in this "if" sentences?
>
>
> We are not writing an RFC so I think we should use lowercase.

corrected.

Cheers, Jan

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] next version of RIPE-501, v.2
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] next version of RIPE-501, v.2

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]