This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/

[ipv6-wg] next version of RIPE-501, v.2

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] next version of RIPE-501, v.2
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] next version of RIPE-501, v.2

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Sander Steffann sander at steffann.nl
Mon Jul 25 01:21:12 CEST 2011

Hi,

>> I would put this in 'mandatory':
>> 
>> - If the IS-IS routing protocol is requested the equipment MUST
>> support "M-ISIS: Multi-Topology (MT) Routing in Intermediate System
>> to Intermediate Systems (IS-ISs)" [RFC 5120]
> 
> ok, I see you already updated the draft on Gdocs.

I didn't put this change in yet though :)

> One question, should we use "MUST" with capital letters or we use normal "must" in this "if" sentences?


We are not writing an RFC so I think we should use lowercase.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Sander Steffann

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] next version of RIPE-501, v.2
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] next version of RIPE-501, v.2

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]