This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/

[ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jan Zorz @ go6.si jan at go6.si
Tue Jul 19 14:50:47 CEST 2011

On 7/19/11 2:25 PM, Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve) wrote:
> Why do you think ND and SLAAC would behave differently in 4000::/3 ?
>
> GV>  I know just like you it is farfetched, but why not?
> GV>  it just takes somebody to rewrite all ND, SLAAC, DHCP, etc... :-)

...and have two incompatible protocols in different parts of the same 
numbering space (::/0), that probably could not even talk to each other.

Brilliant.

:)

/jan

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]