[ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)

Le 11-07-19 08:17, Jan Zorz @ go6.si a écrit :
> On 7/19/11 1:44 PM, Ahmed Abu-Abed wrote:
>> I am not proposing a change with respect to existing RFCs; we must to
>> live with existing /64 subnets as a minimum allocation.
>>
>> My comments apply for future networks beyond the current 2000::/3 range
>> used by all RIRs. Beyond this range all options are still open.
>
> I don't think so. IPv6 as protocol applies over all ::/0, not only 2000::/3
>
> Why do you think ND and SLAAC would behave differently in 4000::/3 ?
>

I think Ahmed is referring to:

<RFC4291>
    Future specifications may redefine one or more sub-ranges of the
    Global Unicast space for other purposes, but unless and until that
    happens, implementations must treat all addresses that do not start
    with any of the above-listed prefixes as Global Unicast addresses.
</RFC4291>

> Cheers, Jan


-- 
=========
IETF81 Quebec city: http://ietf81.ca
IPv6 book: Migrating to IPv6, Wiley. http://www.ipv6book.ca
Stun/Turn server for VoIP NAT-FW traversal: http://numb.viagenie.ca
DTN Implementation: http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64-DNS64 Opensource: http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
Space Assigned Number Authority: http://sanaregistry.org