This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg] Youtube over IPv6!
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Youtube over IPv6!
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Youtube over IPv6!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco Hogewoning
marcoh at marcoh.net
Fri Feb 12 13:01:50 CET 2010
On 12 feb 2010, at 12:25, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:13:35PM +0100, Marco Hogewoning wrote: >> And the list goes on and on, for instance due to OS weirdness (or >> shall I say brokenness) probably half of the traffic I could get >> over IPv6 comes in over IPv4, this solely relies on whatever DNS >> query returns first. Accoording to reports on nanog, DECNIC just >> stopped responding to queries from 6to4 hosts, this might show a >> drop again in the German graphs. > > Would that be "DENIC"? If yes, can you point me to the Nanog article? Yeah, sorry for the typo: http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2010-February/018162.html > (Since we're providing IPv6 transit to DENIC, it might be a problem with > our 6to4 relay - or with their routing. They're multihomed, they make > their own mistakes^Wdecisions...) Love to hear if in fact this is policy or simply a technical issue and bad translation from a service representative. MarcoH
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Youtube over IPv6!
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Youtube over IPv6!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]