This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com
Michael.Dillon at btradianz.com
Tue Nov 15 11:53:04 CET 2005
> DENIC is providing a public service (namely: DNS for the .de TLD) - and > *the whole world* wants to reach their DNS servers. (No different > to .com and other large TLDs) OK, DENIC is providing a public service. But DENIC's network is still only serving DENIC itself. RIRs give out address allocations to network operators whose networks are serving many organizations. If DENIC's newtork was serving many organizations and allowing .FR, .SK, .RU and .PE to provide their public services over the DENIC global anycast network, then RIPE should give you addresses to run your anycast network. But if DENIC is not going to serve other organizations then RIPE should not give you the addresses but should tell you to go and find a global anycast network operator to assist you. --Michael Dillon
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]