[address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?

jorgen at hovland.cx (Jørgen Hovland) wrote:

> Company X/DENIC may contact company Y/MCI. MCI may place 500 DENIC servers
> around the world at their collocation facilities. MCI may then assign DENIC
> one /64 prefix from their /32 prefix which will be routed to the closest
> DENIC server in MCIs network.
> 	Would this be a suitable solution? This /32 has not been given to
> MCI by the RIR explicit for anycast purposes.

Vendor/ISP dependence has never been a solution for better availability.

Michael and you are somewhat off the track IMHO. Read Gert's comment, too.

Yours,
	Elmar.

--

"Begehe nur nicht den Fehler, Meinung durch Sachverstand zu substituieren."
                          (PLemken, <bu6o7e$e6v0p$2 at ID-31.news.uni-berlin.de>)

--------------------------------------------------------------[ ELMI-RIPE ]---