This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Sat Nov 12 14:12:47 CET 2005
>>> That's the point. DENIC isn't doing this for themselves. They >>> do this for *you* >> in a peer2peer or client/server world, this statement is fatuous > So we abandon DNS, because it's a model from the last century? you can if you want to. i did not suggest doing so, so i guess you would like to. whatever rocks your boat. my point was simple, aside from the total end user (ones not running edonkey or having bought sony cds), most hosts provide to others, certainly all interesting hosts. while folk who need to look up in the de namespace appreciate what denic does, i don't think they do it for free. so we'll withold the gold medals if you don't mind. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]