[address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?

Hi,

On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 09:52:53PM -1000, Randy Bush wrote:
> > That's the point.  DENIC isn't doing this for themselves.  They
> > do this for *you*
> 
> in a peer2peer or client/server world, this statement is fatuous

So we abandon DNS, because it's a model from the last century?

(Now that would be a policy proposal for the DNS WG, not for address
policy -- but I'm all for it, this whole hassle with "finding a free
domain name" and "going to court with name right holders" and so on
is really annoying)

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  81421

SpaceNet AG                    Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14      Tel : +49-89-32356-0
D- 80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-234