This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Who provides v6 uplink via tunnel ?
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Who provides v6 uplink via tunnel ?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Who provides v6 uplink via tunnel ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeroen Massar
jeroen at unfix.org
Sun May 22 15:05:39 CEST 2005
On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 13:16 +0200, Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:01:58PM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote: > > if you are a not at an IX yet I would really > > start to question the IPv6 address request procedures... > > I can't follow you here. The IPv6 allocation policies are not tied to > technical infrastructure requirements, and that's a good thing - we *want* > smaller ISPs to be able to get an IPv6 allocation, even if they can't > reasonably warrant to connect to a major IX. Especially as upstream > prices tend to be cheaper these days than just the access link to an IX, > unless you happen to sit in the same city... Usually, afaik, ISP's are already at an IX and also have their upstreams there and are mostly operating from a colo close to that IX, thus being at an IX also directly makes one have multiple upstreams and thus at least one of them having IPv6 connectivity available. Greets, Jeroen -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 240 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20050522/6df5d16e/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Who provides v6 uplink via tunnel ?
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Who provides v6 uplink via tunnel ?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]